Seeni Alias Srinivasan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 4/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNPB010000992025
e-Filing Number
03-01-2025
Filing Number
85/2025
Filing Date
06-01-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
493
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PADALUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seeni Alias Srinivasan
Adv. TAMILSELVAN N
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Seeni @ Seenivasan under IPC Section 397 (dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt) with a sentence of one year simple imprisonment and ₹1,000 fine. The court found the victim's identification of the accused credible, corroborated by recovery of stolen gold ornaments and the accused's confession statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Seeni @ Seenivasan under IPC Section 397 (dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt) with a sentence of one year simple imprisonment and ₹1,000 fine. The court found the victim's identification of the accused credible, corroborated by recovery of stolen gold ornaments and the accused's confession statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts