Seeni Alias Seenivasan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 3/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNPB010000962025
e-Filing Number
03-01-2025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
06-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
469
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PADALUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seeni Alias Seenivasan
Adv. TAMILSELVAN N
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Seenivasan under Section 397 IPC for dacoity with violence. The appellate court found the victim's eyewitness testimony credible, corroborated by the recovery of stolen gold ornaments following the accused's confession, establishing both circumstances of the crime without evidentiary gaps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Seenivasan under Section 397 IPC for dacoity with violence. The appellate court found the victim's eyewitness testimony credible, corroborated by the recovery of stolen gold ornaments following the accused's confession, establishing both circumstances of the crime without evidentiary gaps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts