N.K.Jagadish Kumar vs Sheela Advocate - HARIHARAN R — 25/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6R14A. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNNS060004372024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
25/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kotagiri
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Kothagiri.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.K.Jagadish Kumar
Adv. Thiru.R.Ravi
Respondent(s)
Sheela Advocate - HARIHARAN R
G.Vijaya Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Kothagiri.
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Mediation |
| 10-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 14-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 06-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 25/2024 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kotagiri dismissed the temporary injunction application (I.A. No. 2/2024) filed by N.K. Jagadishkumar against Mrs. Sheela and G. Vijayakumar on June 16, 2025. The court held that granting temporary injunction would amount to granting final relief without examining witnesses and evidence, citing applicable High Court precedent. Since the suit is ready for trial and no documents were marked by either party, the court found it unable to decide the petition's subject matter at the interim stage. The petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 25/2024 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kotagiri dismissed the temporary injunction application (I.A. No. 2/2024) filed by N.K. Jagadishkumar against Mrs. Sheela and G. Vijayakumar on June 16, 2025. The court held that granting temporary injunction would amount to granting final relief without examining witnesses and evidence, citing applicable High Court precedent. Since the suit is ready for trial and no documents were marked by either party, the court found it unable to decide the petition's subject matter at the interim stage. The petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts