Karthikeyan vs Sureshkumar — 226/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNNM160023242025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
2305/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
226/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumarapalayam
Judge
30-Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karthikeyan
Adv. Venkatesh M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sureshkumar
Case History
-
10-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jul-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 226/2026 Court: Criminal Magistrate Court, Kumarabarayam Date: 09.06.2026 Outcome: The first witness (Rajeejundran, Assistant) for petitioner Karthikeyan testified on June 9, 2026, under Section 54(9) of the 1969 Act. The witness submitted four documentary exhibits (cash memo, written memo, court notice, and acknowledgment card dated September 16-23, 2025). The accused was absent; a filed petition was allowed. Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was postponed to a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
29-May-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
26-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 226/2026
Case Summary: 226/2026 Court: Criminal Magistrate Court, Kumarabarayam Date: 09.06.2026 Outcome: The first witness (Rajeejundran, Assistant) for petitioner Karthikeyan testified on June 9, 2026, under Section 54(9) of the 1969 Act. The witness submitted four documentary exhibits (cash memo, written memo, court notice, and acknowledgment card dated September 16-23, 2025). The accused was absent; a filed petition was allowed. Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was postponed to a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts