SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUMARAPALAYAM vs MANOCHITRA — 2/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,427,506(i). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 08th July 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNNM160022502025
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
2231/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumarapalayam
Judge
30-Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
Decision Date
08-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
475
Police Station
Kumarapalayam P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUMARAPALAYAM
Adv. Inspector of police Komarapalayam
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANOCHITRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jul-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate accepted the investigation officer's final report classifying FIR No. 475/2023 as a "Mistake of Fact" and closed the case. The original FIR against Manochitra involved charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 506(1) and the TNPHW Act; the defacto complainant appeared in court and expressed no objection to closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jul-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
26-May-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
24-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
23-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
09-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2026
The Judicial Magistrate accepted the investigation officer's final report classifying FIR No. 475/2023 as a "Mistake of Fact" and closed the case. The original FIR against Manochitra involved charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 506(1) and the TNPHW Act; the defacto complainant appeared in court and expressed no objection to closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts