Sub Inspector of Police, Veppadai PS vs PALANISAMY — 253/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(2),326. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 26th May 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNNM160018802025
e-Filing Number
22-10-2025
Filing Number
1861/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
253/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumarapalayam
Judge
30-Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
158
Police Station
Veppadai P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of Police, Veppadai PS (Police Station)
Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.PALANISAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 253/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court accepted the police investigation officer's "Mistake of Fact" final report and closed FIR No. 158/2023 (involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(2), 325 against Palanisamy). The defacto complainant, despite multiple court adjournments from December 2025 to May 2026, failed to file a protest petition and was deemed to have no objection, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
12-May-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
24-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
23-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
09-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam
-
31-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 253/2025
Case 253/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court accepted the police investigation officer's "Mistake of Fact" final report and closed FIR No. 158/2023 (involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(2), 325 against Palanisamy). The defacto complainant, despite multiple court adjournments from December 2025 to May 2026, failed to file a protest petition and was deemed to have no objection, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts