Anbazhagan vs Sumathi.K Advocate - Palanisamy.M. — 576/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNNM160011102022

Filing Number

1110/2022

Filing Date

23-May-2022

Registration No

576/2022

Registration Date

23-May-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumarapalayam

Judge

30-Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anbazhagan

    Adv. Karunanithi.V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sumathi.K Advocate - Palanisamy.M.

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  6. 01-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  7. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  8. 18-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: STC.No.576/2022 On May 18, 2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of the petitioner Anbazhagan's witness (first witness) before the Criminal Court at Kumbakonam. The accused was absent; a petition was filed and allowed. The witness testified regarding his business activities (real estate, finance company operations), financial transactions involving loans to the respondent through three finance companies (Lakshmi Groups, Royal Universal Finance, Royal Maxi Finance), and his wife's involvement in lending. The witness denied various allegations, clarified discrepancies in bank cheque signatures, and stated the case should proceed despite challenges in contacting the respondent. The court recorded the witness statement and observations regarding the case's merit and procedural viability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 18-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  10. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  11. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  12. 06-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  13. 06-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  14. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  17. 19-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  18. 05-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  19. 03-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  21. 16-May-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  22. 21-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  23. 21-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  24. 20-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  25. 02-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  26. 23-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  27. 23-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  28. 12-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  29. 08-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  30. 05-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  31. 24-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  32. 18-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  33. 29-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  34. 18-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  35. 03-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  36. 11-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  37. 28-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  38. 19-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  39. 22-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  40. 10-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  41. 22-Feb-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  42. 25-Jan-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  43. 07-Dec-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  44. 14-Nov-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  45. 02-Nov-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  46. 28-Sep-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  47. 01-Sep-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  48. 08-Aug-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  49. 02-Aug-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam

  50. 29-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 23-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 576/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC.No.576/2022 On May 18, 2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of the petitioner Anbazhagan's witness (first witness) before the Criminal Court at Kumbakonam. The accused was absent; a petition was filed and allowed. The witness testified regarding his business activities (real estate, finance company operations), financial transactions involving loans to the respondent through three finance companies (Lakshmi Groups, Royal Universal Finance, Royal Maxi Finance), and his wife's involvement in lending. The witness denied various allegations, clarified discrepancies in bank cheque signatures, and stated the case should proceed despite challenges in contacting the respondent. The court recorded the witness statement and observations regarding the case's merit and procedural viability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case