State Government Sub Inspector Of Police PEW Namakkal vs Manikandan Advocate - Selvaraj.R — 271/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNNM140007802025

e-Filing Number

08-06-2025

Filing Number

779/2025

Filing Date

09-Aug-2025

Registration No

271/2025

Registration Date

25-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sendamangalam

Judge

28-Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

Decision Date

01-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

PEW Namakkal P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Sub Inspector Of Police PEW Namakkal

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan Advocate - Selvaraj.R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 271/2025 Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Manikandan, finding that the state failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he unlawfully possessed and sold 2 liters of alcohol in violation of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). The court discharged the accused under BNSS Section 271(1), citing critical evidentiary gaps including failure to properly produce the seized alcohol container in court and inconsistencies in the investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  4. 25-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  5. 24-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 24-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  7. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  8. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  9. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  10. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  11. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  12. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  13. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  14. 07-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  16. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  17. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  18. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  19. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  20. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  21. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  22. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  23. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  24. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  25. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  26. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  27. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  28. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  29. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  30. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  31. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  32. 22-Oct-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  33. 25-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 09-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 271/2025 Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Manikandan, finding that the state failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he unlawfully possessed and sold 2 liters of alcohol in violation of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). The court discharged the accused under BNSS Section 271(1), citing critical evidentiary gaps including failure to properly produce the seized alcohol container in court and inconsistencies in the investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case