V.Ravi vs S.Venkatraman — 524/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNNM060016222022
Filing Number
1627/2022
Filing Date
30-Nov-2022
Registration No
524/2022
Registration Date
09-Dec-2022
Court
Principal Sub Court, Thiruchengode
Judge
34-Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.Ravi
Adv. Karunanithi.V
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.Venkatraman
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jun-2026
Trial
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
17-Apr-2026
Issues
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
02-Apr-2026
Issues
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
18-Mar-2026
Issues
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: V.Ravi v. S.Venkatraman (O.S. 524/2022) Outcome: Petition Dismissed V.Ravi sought attachment of S.Venkatraman's property before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC, claiming the defendant borrowed ₹3,00,000 via promissory note (dated 10.04.2021) and was attempting to alienate the property to defeat recovery. The court dismissed the petition, finding the plaintiff failed to establish both a prima facie case and concrete evidence that the defendant intended to dispose of assets to obstruct decree execution. Vague allegations unsupported by specific particulars were deemed insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Issues
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
02-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
19-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
20-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
02-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
18-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
03-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
06-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
29-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
13-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
17-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
05-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
01-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
06-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
12-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
02-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
18-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
12-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of Judgment
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of Judgment
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of Judgment
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of Judgment
-
28-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
04-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
23-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
23-Aug-2024
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
16-Jul-2024
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
26-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
09-Jan-2024
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
09-Oct-2023
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
19-Jun-2023
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
17-Mar-2023
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
24-Feb-2023
IA Pending
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
02-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode
-
09-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 524/2022
Case Summary: V.Ravi v. S.Venkatraman (O.S. 524/2022) Outcome: Petition Dismissed V.Ravi sought attachment of S.Venkatraman's property before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC, claiming the defendant borrowed ₹3,00,000 via promissory note (dated 10.04.2021) and was attempting to alienate the property to defeat recovery. The court dismissed the petition, finding the plaintiff failed to establish both a prima facie case and concrete evidence that the defendant intended to dispose of assets to obstruct decree execution. Vague allegations unsupported by specific particulars were deemed insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts