Ezhavalavan vs Ravi travels represented by its Ravirajan — 1269/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY090043212022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4261/2022
Filing Date
23-12-2022
Registration No
1269/2022
Registration Date
23-12-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ezhavalavan
Adv. Thiru G. M. SUDHAKAR
Respondent(s)
Ravi travels represented by its Ravirajan
Ravirajan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Court convicted the defendants under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds. The court found that the complainant proved beyond doubt that the defendant issued a cheque for ₹7,00,000 for a business loan on October 2, 2020, and despite returning the cheque on October 1, 2022 due to account closure, intentionally deceived the complainant by knowingly providing a worthless cheque. The court sentenced the defendant to 6 months imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹7,00,000 to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Court convicted the defendants under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds. The court found that the complainant proved beyond doubt that the defendant issued a cheque for ₹7,00,000 for a business loan on October 2, 2020, and despite returning the cheque on October 1, 2022 due to account closure, intentionally deceived the complainant by knowingly providing a worthless cheque. The court sentenced the defendant to 6 months imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹7,00,000 to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts