Mohamed Amjath vs Mathivanan — 90/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY090041932024

Part Heard

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

158/2024

Filing Date

20-12-2024

Registration No

90/2024

Registration Date

20-12-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

Mohamed Amjath

Adv. Thiru.K.BALAMURUGAN

Respondent(s)

Mathivanan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

20-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

26-02-2026

Part Heard

12-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: 90/2024 (Mohamed Amjath v. Mathivanan) Court: District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi Date: 12.03.2026 The court examined petitioner Mohamed Amjath's testimony regarding a disputed agricultural property. Amjath claimed he purchased the land from a power of attorney holder in April 2024 and later discovered the respondent cultivating it. After being stopped, Amjath filed a police complaint, which police referred as a civil matter. During cross-examination, Amjath admitted he had not verified prior possession details, knew nothing of the respondent's long-term cultivation, and had not negotiated directly for possession. The court found insufficient grounds for the case to proceed, ruling the matter is primarily civil in nature and should be resolved through civil courts rather than criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed/case was ordered to be pursued through appropriate civil remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 90/2024 (Mohamed Amjath v. Mathivanan) Court: District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi Date: 12.03.2026 The court examined petitioner Mohamed Amjath's testimony regarding a disputed agricultural property. Amjath claimed he purchased the land from a power of attorney holder in April 2024 and later discovered the respondent cultivating it. After being stopped, Amjath filed a police complaint, which police referred as a civil matter. During cross-examination, Amjath admitted he had not verified prior possession details, knew nothing of the respondent's long-term cultivation, and had not negotiated directly for possession. The court found insufficient grounds for the case to proceed, ruling the matter is primarily civil in nature and should be resolved through civil courts rather than criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed/case was ordered to be pursued through appropriate civil remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case