Shanthi vs Jeyalakshimi — 50/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY090026922024

IA Pending

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

83/2024

Filing Date

24-06-2024

Registration No

50/2024

Registration Date

24-06-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

Shanthi

Adv. Thiru. M.ARMSTRONG

Respondent(s)

Jeyalakshimi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

16-04-2026

IA Pending

02-04-2026

IA Pending

16-03-2026

IA Pending

12-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

07-04-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: 50/2024 (Shanthi v. Jeyalakshimi) On 07.04.2025, the District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi, recorded the sworn testimony (examination-in-chief) of petitioner Shanthi (P.W.1) in a property dispute case involving survey number errors. During cross-examination, the court documented Shanthi's admissions that she did not implead the original seller (Saminathan) as a party despite claiming errors in revenue documents, attempted to obtain a correction deed without proper notice, and acknowledged the respondent's representative was willing to execute a correction deed. The case proceeded with examination of evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 50/2024 (Shanthi v. Jeyalakshimi) On 07.04.2025, the District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi, recorded the sworn testimony (examination-in-chief) of petitioner Shanthi (P.W.1) in a property dispute case involving survey number errors. During cross-examination, the court documented Shanthi's admissions that she did not implead the original seller (Saminathan) as a party despite claiming errors in revenue documents, attempted to obtain a correction deed without proper notice, and acknowledged the respondent's representative was willing to execute a correction deed. The case proceeded with examination of evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case