Shanthi vs Jeyalakshimi — 50/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY090026922024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
83/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
50/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shanthi
Adv. Thiru. M.ARMSTRONG
Respondent(s)
Jeyalakshimi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 50/2024 (Shanthi v. Jeyalakshimi) On 07.04.2025, the District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi, recorded the sworn testimony (examination-in-chief) of petitioner Shanthi (P.W.1) in a property dispute case involving survey number errors. During cross-examination, the court documented Shanthi's admissions that she did not implead the original seller (Saminathan) as a party despite claiming errors in revenue documents, attempted to obtain a correction deed without proper notice, and acknowledged the respondent's representative was willing to execute a correction deed. The case proceeded with examination of evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 50/2024 (Shanthi v. Jeyalakshimi) On 07.04.2025, the District Civil and Criminal Court, Tarangambadi, recorded the sworn testimony (examination-in-chief) of petitioner Shanthi (P.W.1) in a property dispute case involving survey number errors. During cross-examination, the court documented Shanthi's admissions that she did not implead the original seller (Saminathan) as a party despite claiming errors in revenue documents, attempted to obtain a correction deed without proper notice, and acknowledged the respondent's representative was willing to execute a correction deed. The case proceeded with examination of evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts