Jayakumar vs Balaji — 82/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY090026672021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
133/2021
Filing Date
08-09-2021
Registration No
82/2021
Registration Date
08-09-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayakumar
Adv. Thiru. P. Narayanamoorthi
Respondent(s)
Balaji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Disposed
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 19-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (P.W.1) regarding a property dispute involving trust-administered land (6 acres 40 cents) in Tarangambadi. The witness testified about the property's lease arrangement made through his father approximately 50 years ago, confirmed details of a 1978 Scheme Decree establishing trust governance with 5 trustees and a manager, and identified various structures and boundaries on the property. The cross-examination was adjourned, with the court noting inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding property boundaries and details provided in the original case statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (P.W.1) regarding a property dispute involving trust-administered land (6 acres 40 cents) in Tarangambadi. The witness testified about the property's lease arrangement made through his father approximately 50 years ago, confirmed details of a 1978 Scheme Decree establishing trust governance with 5 trustees and a manager, and identified various structures and boundaries on the property. The cross-examination was adjourned, with the court noting inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding property boundaries and details provided in the original case statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts