Balasubramaniyan vs The District Collector — 113/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R1 S26. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY090023762023

Filing Number

179/2023

Filing Date

29-Nov-2023

Registration No

113/2023

Registration Date

29-Nov-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R1 S26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balasubramaniyan

    Adv. Thiru. K.SANKARAN

  2. 2.Rajaraman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector

  2. 2.District Revenue Officer

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Thasildar

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    In Case 113/2023, the court conducted cross-examination of petitioner Rajaraman (P.W.1) on 22.01.2026 regarding his claim for patta (land deed) changes for inherited agricultural property. Rajaraman testified that he sought patta for 4½ cents in Sembianur and 38.5 cents in Themarpatti, properties inherited from his father Vaidyanathasami (who purchased in 1963) and covered by a will dividing the property between him and his brother Balasubramaniyan. He stated he submitted applications to the Revenue Divisional Officer and sent communications via registered post, and also filed a writ petition in Madras High Court requesting patta for 43 cents. After obtaining the High Court's order, he approached the Tahsildar's office twice requesting patta changes but received no proper response. The case record shows the examination of evidence proceeding with cross-questioning on the petitioner's claims and actions taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  16. 31-Oct-2025

    List / Special List

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  23. 20-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  24. 06-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  25. 25-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  26. 19-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  27. 07-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  28. 02-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  29. 29-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  30. 08-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  31. 24-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  32. 20-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  33. 03-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  34. 15-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  35. 21-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  36. 07-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  37. 08-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  38. 04-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  39. 29-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 29-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 113/2023, the court conducted cross-examination of petitioner Rajaraman (P.W.1) on 22.01.2026 regarding his claim for patta (land deed) changes for inherited agricultural property. Rajaraman testified that he sought patta for 4½ cents in Sembianur and 38.5 cents in Themarpatti, properties inherited from his father Vaidyanathasami (who purchased in 1963) and covered by a will dividing the property between him and his brother Balasubramaniyan. He stated he submitted applications to the Revenue Divisional Officer and sent communications via registered post, and also filed a writ petition in Madras High Court requesting patta for 43 cents. After obtaining the High Court's order, he approached the Tahsildar's office twice requesting patta changes but received no proper response. The case record shows the examination of evidence proceeding with cross-questioning on the petitioner's claims and actions taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case