Elangovan vs Kalaivani — 36/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY090016532024
Filing Number
60/2024
Filing Date
29-04-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Elangovan
Adv. K. Senthil Azhagan
Respondent(s)
Kalaivani
Baskaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS No. 36/2024 - Elangovan v. Kalaivani & Baskaran The court ruled in favor of petitioner Elangovan regarding a property dispute involving plot no. 172/1A 1A in Tarangambadi. The court held that a deed dated 31.10.1996 (document no. 658/1996) executed by the first respondent to the second respondent does not invalidate the petitioner's rights to the property. The court granted relief to the petitioner, declaring that the contested deed is null and void and does not restrict the petitioner's ownership rights, with costs awarded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 36/2024 - Elangovan v. Kalaivani & Baskaran The court ruled in favor of petitioner Elangovan regarding a property dispute involving plot no. 172/1A 1A in Tarangambadi. The court held that a deed dated 31.10.1996 (document no. 658/1996) executed by the first respondent to the second respondent does not invalidate the petitioner's rights to the property. The court granted relief to the petitioner, declaring that the contested deed is null and void and does not restrict the petitioner's ownership rights, with costs awarded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts