Elangovan vs Kalaivani — 36/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY090016532024

Filing Number

60/2024

Filing Date

29-Apr-2024

Registration No

36/2024

Registration Date

29-Apr-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Elangovan

    Adv. K. Senthil Azhagan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalaivani

  2. 2.Baskaran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of Decree/Decretal OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 36/2024 - Elangovan v. Kalaivani & Baskaran The court ruled in favor of petitioner Elangovan regarding a property dispute involving plot no. 172/1A 1A in Tarangambadi. The court held that a deed dated 31.10.1996 (document no. 658/1996) executed by the first respondent to the second respondent does not invalidate the petitioner's rights to the property. The court granted relief to the petitioner, declaring that the contested deed is null and void and does not restrict the petitioner's ownership rights, with costs awarded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  17. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  20. 01-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  21. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  22. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  23. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  24. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  25. 14-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  26. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  27. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  28. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  29. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  30. 24-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  31. 03-Apr-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  32. 03-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  33. 17-Mar-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  34. 17-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  35. 17-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  36. 03-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  37. 19-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  38. 12-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  39. 14-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  40. 19-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  41. 07-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  42. 05-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  43. 01-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  44. 15-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  45. 24-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  46. 29-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 29-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 36/2024 - Elangovan v. Kalaivani & Baskaran The court ruled in favor of petitioner Elangovan regarding a property dispute involving plot no. 172/1A 1A in Tarangambadi. The court held that a deed dated 31.10.1996 (document no. 658/1996) executed by the first respondent to the second respondent does not invalidate the petitioner's rights to the property. The court granted relief to the petitioner, declaring that the contested deed is null and void and does not restrict the petitioner's ownership rights, with costs awarded to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case