Inspector of Police, Poombukar vs Manikandan — 738/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),352,506(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY090016332025
e-Filing Number
09-09-2025
Filing Number
1512/2025
Filing Date
06-10-2025
Registration No
738/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
431
Police Station
Poompuhar Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Poombukar
Adv. Inspector of police poompuhar
Respondent(s)
Manikandan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 04-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 20-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Criminal Court in Tiruvannamalai acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, and 506(i) in a case involving alleged abusive language, criminal intimidation, and assault from September 18, 2021. The court found that prosecution witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony, with the main complainant admitting to filing a false report based on suspicion rather than direct knowledge, while the eyewitness claimed ignorance of the entire incident. Applying the principle of "benefit of doubt," the court discharged the accused and quashed their interim bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Criminal Court in Tiruvannamalai acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, and 506(i) in a case involving alleged abusive language, criminal intimidation, and assault from September 18, 2021. The court found that prosecution witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony, with the main complainant admitting to filing a false report based on suspicion rather than direct knowledge, while the eyewitness claimed ignorance of the entire incident. Applying the principle of "benefit of doubt," the court discharged the accused and quashed their interim bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts