Parvathy vs Rajendran — 244/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Sworn Statement. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY090007252025
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
650/2025
Filing Date
14-05-2025
Registration No
244/2025
Registration Date
14-05-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parvathy
Respondent(s)
Rajendran
Asokan
Dharani
Dhanalakshimi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
Sworn Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Sworn Statement | |
| 07-04-2026 | Sworn Statement | |
| 03-03-2026 | Sworn Statement | |
| 10-02-2026 | Sworn Statement | |
| 03-02-2026 | Sworn Statement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Crl.M.P. No. 244/2025, District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi Date: 03.02.2026 The petitioner (Pennammal) filed a criminal petition alleging that on 29.01.2024, she and her mother-in-law were assaulted by neighbors Rajeendran and his family members (including his brother Ashok, daughter Dharani, and wife) following an earlier land dispute. The petitioner sought action against the accused. The court admitted the petition and directed that proceedings be conducted in accordance with law, allowing further examination of evidence and arguments from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Crl.M.P. No. 244/2025, District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi Date: 03.02.2026 The petitioner (Pennammal) filed a criminal petition alleging that on 29.01.2024, she and her mother-in-law were assaulted by neighbors Rajeendran and his family members (including his brother Ashok, daughter Dharani, and wife) following an earlier land dispute. The petitioner sought action against the accused. The court admitted the petition and directed that proceedings be conducted in accordance with law, allowing further examination of evidence and arguments from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts