G. Maragatham vs S. Selvam — 19/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1S26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY090006282024
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
31/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G. Maragatham
Adv. Thiur.S.KAVIYARASAN
Respondent(s)
S. Selvam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
IA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 23-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. 19/2024 | Court: District Civil & Criminal Court, Tarangambadi | Date: 24.11.2025 Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of plaintiff (P.W.1) regarding a civil dispute over property (Survey No. 567/41). The plaintiff's testimony revealed inconsistencies, including inability to recall property boundaries, delayed filing of a deed settlement after reporting original documents missing, and lack of police complaint regarding the defendant's alleged trespass. The cross-examination highlighted contradictions in the plaintiff's claims regarding possession and the necessity of the defendant's alleged intrusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. 19/2024 | Court: District Civil & Criminal Court, Tarangambadi | Date: 24.11.2025 Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of plaintiff (P.W.1) regarding a civil dispute over property (Survey No. 567/41). The plaintiff's testimony revealed inconsistencies, including inability to recall property boundaries, delayed filing of a deed settlement after reporting original documents missing, and lack of police complaint regarding the defendant's alleged trespass. The cross-examination highlighted contradictions in the plaintiff's claims regarding possession and the necessity of the defendant's alleged intrusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts