Inspector of Police, Poombukar vs Kalaidoss — 227/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY090005862024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2024

Filing Number

558/2024

Filing Date

27-02-2024

Registration No

227/2025

Registration Date

25-11-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

430

Police Station

Poompuhar Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),324,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, Poombukar

Adv. Inspector of police poompuhar

Respondent(s)

Kalaidoss

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Judgement

06-03-2026

Questioning

04-03-2026

Part Heard

18-02-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The District Magistrate Court in Tarangambadi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) (abusive language, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution witnesses, particularly the complainant (witness 1), gave contradictory testimony—initially claiming specific injuries from a stone attack but later admitting uncertainty about the attackers' identities and that he filed a false complaint. Since the government's case rested on unreliable witness testimony and lacked corroborating evidence, the court ruled that the charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the defendants under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Magistrate Court in Tarangambadi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) (abusive language, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution witnesses, particularly the complainant (witness 1), gave contradictory testimony—initially claiming specific injuries from a stone attack but later admitting uncertainty about the attackers' identities and that he filed a false complaint. Since the government's case rested on unreliable witness testimony and lacked corroborating evidence, the court ruled that the charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the defendants under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case