Inspector of Police, Sembanarkoil vs RAJASEKARAN — 35/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),332,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY090005022025

e-Filing Number

20-03-2025

Filing Number

458/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

735

Police Station

sembanarkoil Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),332,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Sembanarkoil

    Adv. Sembanorkoil PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJASEKARAN

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a witness deposition record (not a case judgment) in C.C. No. 35-2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi. PW 5 (Bharathiraja) was examined on 07.03.2026 regarding an incident from 17.08.2021 involving a dispute at a bank near his shop; he testified that his signature does not appear on the inspection report despite police claims that he signed it. The deposition records his examination-in-chief and cross-examination by the prosecution, with no cross-examination by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  10. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  18. 06-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  19. 01-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  20. 13-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  21. 30-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a witness deposition record (not a case judgment) in C.C. No. 35-2025 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi. PW 5 (Bharathiraja) was examined on 07.03.2026 regarding an incident from 17.08.2021 involving a dispute at a bank near his shop; he testified that his signature does not appear on the inspection report despite police claims that he signed it. The deposition records his examination-in-chief and cross-examination by the prosecution, with no cross-examination by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case