Sheik Mujibur Rahman vs Mohammed Fisal Kalith — 24/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY090004772024
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
456/2024
Filing Date
14-02-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
14-02-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheik Mujibur Rahman
Adv. Thiru P.GANESAMOORTHY
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Fisal Kalith
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (cross-examination) in case STC No. 24/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi, recorded on 24.02.2026. The witness (PW-2) testified regarding monetary transactions, specifically denying that ₹25 lakhs was given directly or that ₹13 lakhs was transferred via online transaction, and refuted claims of giving false testimony. The document contains the witness's sworn statement during cross-examination but does not constitute a final court order or judgment on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (cross-examination) in case STC No. 24/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tharangambadi, recorded on 24.02.2026. The witness (PW-2) testified regarding monetary transactions, specifically denying that ₹25 lakhs was given directly or that ₹13 lakhs was transferred via online transaction, and refuted claims of giving false testimony. The document contains the witness's sworn statement during cross-examination but does not constitute a final court order or judgment on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts