Natarajan vs Paavadai — 17/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY090002452022

Amendment

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

31/2022

Filing Date

22-02-2022

Registration No

17/2022

Registration Date

22-02-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O 7 R 1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25 D, 27 C
IA/1/2024 Classification : Others Section NatarajanPaavadai
IA/2/2024 Classification : Reopen Petition Section NatarajanPaavadai
IA/3/2024 Classification : Recall Petition Section NatarajanPaavadai

Petitioner(s)

Natarajan

Adv. Thiru. V.BALASUBRAMANIYAN

Samarasam

Respondent(s)

Paavadai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

09-04-2026

Amendment

26-03-2026

Amendment

16-03-2026

Amendment

09-03-2026

IA Pending

04-03-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

01-02-2024
Copy of Decree/Decretal Order

Case Summary Case: OS No. 17/2022, District Civil and Criminal Court, Tirunelveli Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court upheld a decree based on an unregistered will dated 27.03.2003 and granted the plaintiffs possession of the disputed property in Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu. The defendant is permanently restrained from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiffs' rights over the property, and detailed boundaries and property divisions have been specified in the judgment's schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: OS No. 17/2022, District Civil and Criminal Court, Tirunelveli Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court upheld a decree based on an unregistered will dated 27.03.2003 and granted the plaintiffs possession of the disputed property in Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu. The defendant is permanently restrained from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiffs' rights over the property, and detailed boundaries and property divisions have been specified in the judgment's schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case