Neesarbanu vs Mohamed Kaber — 11/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 15th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY090001492025
Filing Number
21/2025
Filing Date
03-Feb-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
03-Feb-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Neesarbanu
Adv. Thiru.K.S.S.GUNASEKARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohamed Kaber
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of Decree/Decretal OrderView PDF
Case 11/2025 - Neesarbanu v. Mohamed Kaber: Summary The District Munsif Court in Tarangambadi decided a land survey dispute on April 15, 2026. Petitioner Neesarbanu challenged survey numbers 78/1 and 78/2 in Mobarayar village, arguing the correct unified survey number should be 78/5A1A1. The court granted relief in favor of the petitioner, accepting that the survey records were incorrect and directing the necessary amendments to official documents to reflect the correct survey number 78/5A1A1 for the consolidated property parcels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
06-Apr-2026
Reopen
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
30-Mar-2026
Reopen
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
18-Mar-2026
Reopen
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
19-Jan-2026
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
04-Dec-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
10-Nov-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
06-Nov-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
03-Nov-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
13-Oct-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
20-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
08-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
07-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
28-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
02-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
30-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
12-Jun-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
12-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
03-Apr-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
03-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
-
03-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2025
Case 11/2025 - Neesarbanu v. Mohamed Kaber: Summary The District Munsif Court in Tarangambadi decided a land survey dispute on April 15, 2026. Petitioner Neesarbanu challenged survey numbers 78/1 and 78/2 in Mobarayar village, arguing the correct unified survey number should be 78/5A1A1. The court granted relief in favor of the petitioner, accepting that the survey records were incorrect and directing the necessary amendments to official documents to reflect the correct survey number 78/5A1A1 for the consolidated property parcels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts