Ravinchandran vs Pakkirisamy — 4/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 30th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY080088272022
Filing Number
8813/2022
Filing Date
19-Dec-2022
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
27-Jan-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravinchandran
Adv. Thiru. P. NEDUNCHEZHIAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pakkirisamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 4/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pakkirisamy under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 5,00,000. The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 to complainant Ravichandran within one month, with an additional one month imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. Key Reasoning: All elements of Section 138 were satisfied: the cheque was issued for debt discharge, presented within validity period, returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, and the complainant issued a statutory demand notice which was refused. The accused failed to defend the case or rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act, leaving the complainant's evidence unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Feb-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2024
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2024
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2023
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2023
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2023
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2023
Batta
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2023
Service Pending-Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2023
Service Pending-Notice
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2024
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 4/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pakkirisamy under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 5,00,000. The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 to complainant Ravichandran within one month, with an additional one month imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. Key Reasoning: All elements of Section 138 were satisfied: the cheque was issued for debt discharge, presented within validity period, returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, and the complainant issued a statutory demand notice which was refused. The accused failed to defend the case or rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act, leaving the complainant's evidence unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts