The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu Police Station vs KALIYAPERUMAAL — 179/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),342,506(2),326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY080070362022
Filing Number
7022/2022
Filing Date
11-Oct-2022
Registration No
179/2022
Registration Date
18-Oct-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Thiruvenkadu Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALIYAPERUMAAL
-
2.Sundaramoorthy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali acquitted both defendants (Kaliyaperumal and Sundarmurthy) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 326, 506(ii), and 342, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the complainant's testimony was unreliable and contradictory, and the supporting witnesses provided inconsistent accounts, making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Sep-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-May-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2022
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2022
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali acquitted both defendants (Kaliyaperumal and Sundarmurthy) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 326, 506(ii), and 342, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the complainant's testimony was unreliable and contradictory, and the supporting witnesses provided inconsistent accounts, making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts