Ganesh vs Arul — 1098/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Compounded on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNMY080062302023

e-Filing Number

18-12-2023

Filing Number

6230/2023

Filing Date

28-Dec-2023

Registration No

1098/2023

Registration Date

28-Dec-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Compounded

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section GaneshArul
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section GaneshArul
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section GaneshArul

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh

    Adv. VENKATESAN K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arul

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate at Sirkali acquitted the accused A. Arul of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the complainant K. Ganesh and accused reached a compromise settlement. The court accepted the compounding petition filed jointly by both parties, finding the offense compoundable in nature and considering the family friendship between them and the settled dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 14-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 21-May-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 28-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 31-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 02-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 01-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 02-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 20-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 06-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 27-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 15-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 03-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 20-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 13-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 02-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 29-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 28-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1098/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate at Sirkali acquitted the accused A. Arul of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the complainant K. Ganesh and accused reached a compromise settlement. The court accepted the compounding petition filed jointly by both parties, finding the offense compoundable in nature and considering the family friendship between them and the settled dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case