M/s.TN1AMP Tamilasai Mulam UZhavar urpathiyalar Company rep by R. Ashokan vs Hajahussain Owner of Capital and Co., — 1225/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY080054682022
Filing Number
5468/2022
Filing Date
11-Aug-2022
Registration No
1225/2022
Registration Date
07-Sep-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.TN1AMP Tamilasai Mulam UZhavar urpathiyalar Company rep by R. Ashokan
Adv. Thiru S.SUNDARAIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hajahussain Owner of Capital and Co.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali dismissed a cheque bouncing case (Section 138 NI Act) filed by TNIAMP Farmers Producers Company against M. Hajahussain due to the complainant's persistent non-appearance and lack of regular representation throughout the proceedings. The accused was acquitted and discharged, with the court exercising its powers under Section 256 CrPC to dismiss the complaint, noting that the complainant also failed to pay required warrant fees despite multiple directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-May-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Aug-2023
Publication
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2023
Publication
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2023
Steps
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2023
Steps
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
- 27-Oct-2022
-
27-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2022
Sworn Statement
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1225/2022
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali dismissed a cheque bouncing case (Section 138 NI Act) filed by TNIAMP Farmers Producers Company against M. Hajahussain due to the complainant's persistent non-appearance and lack of regular representation throughout the proceedings. The accused was acquitted and discharged, with the court exercising its powers under Section 256 CrPC to dismiss the complaint, noting that the complainant also failed to pay required warrant fees despite multiple directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts