Sub Inspector of police, Vaitheeswarakoil vs Radhakrishnan — 266/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506 (2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY080053372024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-11-2024

Filing Number

5329/2024

Filing Date

23-11-2024

Registration No

266/2024

Registration Date

23-11-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

234

Police Station

Vaitheeswarankoil Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),324,506 (2)

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector of police, Vaitheeswarakoil

Adv. Inspector of police vaitheeswarankoil

Respondent(s)

Radhakrishnan

Rajkumar

Ramesh

Kasinathan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

27-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Questioning

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: CC.No.266/2024 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali acquitted all four defendants (Radhakrishnan, Rajkumar, Ramesh, and Kashinathan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses (Government Witnesses 1 and 2) gave contradictory testimony inconsistent with the case, while relying primarily on the testimony of Government Witness 3 (a police officer) was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly given the complainant's death before trial and absence of corroborating eyewitness evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.266/2024 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali acquitted all four defendants (Radhakrishnan, Rajkumar, Ramesh, and Kashinathan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses (Government Witnesses 1 and 2) gave contradictory testimony inconsistent with the case, while relying primarily on the testimony of Government Witness 3 (a police officer) was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly given the complainant's death before trial and absence of corroborating eyewitness evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case