Selvarani vs Arivazhalagan — 22/2023

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNMY080049912023

Filing Number

4991/2023

Filing Date

22-Sep-2023

Registration No

22/2023

Registration Date

22-Sep-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SelvaraniAnjammal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvarani

    Adv. P.Jeevananthan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arivazhalagan

  2. 2.Anbazhagan

  3. 3.Anjammal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Selvarani's domestic violence petition filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act against her husband Arivaalagan and in-laws. The dismissal was on grounds of default—the petitioner failed to appear for evidence despite multiple opportunities over six months and did not contest the case. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the District Mediation Centre for wasting court time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 09-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 14-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 06-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 15-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 21-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 19-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 25-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 14-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 05-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 01-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 31-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 04-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 21-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 05-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 03-May-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 26-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 03-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 30-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 19-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 22-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Selvarani's domestic violence petition filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act against her husband Arivaalagan and in-laws. The dismissal was on grounds of default—the petitioner failed to appear for evidence despite multiple opportunities over six months and did not contest the case. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the District Mediation Centre for wasting court time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case