Vidhiya vs Madhavan — 29/2024

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNMY080049032024

Filing Number

4895/2024

Filing Date

28-Oct-2024

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

28-Oct-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vidhiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhavan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: DVC No. 29/2024 - Vidya v. Madhavan The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sirkali partly allowed Vidya's domestic violence petition against her husband Madhavan. The court found the respondent committed domestic violence through physical beatings, verbal abuse, drug addiction, endangering behavior (allowing a friend to attempt molestation), and concealing his prior marriage. The court awarded: (1) a protection order prohibiting further harm; (2) monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000 from October 2024 onwards; and (3) compensation of Rs. 5,000. However, the court rejected her stridhana (marriage gift) claim due to insufficient proof of ownership. The respondent's failure to contest the case strengthened the petitioner's case under the preponderance of probability standard applicable in domestic violence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 29-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 14-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  24. 25-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 11-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 23-May-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 13-May-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 15-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Mar-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 17-Feb-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Feb-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 07-Jan-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 28-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 28-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 28-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DVC No. 29/2024 - Vidya v. Madhavan The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sirkali partly allowed Vidya's domestic violence petition against her husband Madhavan. The court found the respondent committed domestic violence through physical beatings, verbal abuse, drug addiction, endangering behavior (allowing a friend to attempt molestation), and concealing his prior marriage. The court awarded: (1) a protection order prohibiting further harm; (2) monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000 from October 2024 onwards; and (3) compensation of Rs. 5,000. However, the court rejected her stridhana (marriage gift) claim due to insufficient proof of ownership. The respondent's failure to contest the case strengthened the petitioner's case under the preponderance of probability standard applicable in domestic violence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case