Vidhiya vs Madhavan — 29/2024

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNMY080049032024

Case disposed

Filing Number

4895/2024

Filing Date

28-10-2024

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

28-10-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

Vidhiya

Respondent(s)

Madhavan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

10-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Arguments

26-03-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: DVC No. 29/2024 - Vidya v. Madhavan The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sirkali partly allowed Vidya's domestic violence petition against her husband Madhavan. The court found the respondent committed domestic violence through physical beatings, verbal abuse, drug addiction, endangering behavior (allowing a friend to attempt molestation), and concealing his prior marriage. The court awarded: (1) a protection order prohibiting further harm; (2) monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000 from October 2024 onwards; and (3) compensation of Rs. 5,000. However, the court rejected her stridhana (marriage gift) claim due to insufficient proof of ownership. The respondent's failure to contest the case strengthened the petitioner's case under the preponderance of probability standard applicable in domestic violence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DVC No. 29/2024 - Vidya v. Madhavan The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sirkali partly allowed Vidya's domestic violence petition against her husband Madhavan. The court found the respondent committed domestic violence through physical beatings, verbal abuse, drug addiction, endangering behavior (allowing a friend to attempt molestation), and concealing his prior marriage. The court awarded: (1) a protection order prohibiting further harm; (2) monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000 from October 2024 onwards; and (3) compensation of Rs. 5,000. However, the court rejected her stridhana (marriage gift) claim due to insufficient proof of ownership. The respondent's failure to contest the case strengthened the petitioner's case under the preponderance of probability standard applicable in domestic violence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case