Ravichandran vs Karthika — 1050/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNMY080034352024

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

3434/2024

Filing Date

31-07-2024

Registration No

1050/2024

Registration Date

31-07-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 142,223
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section RavichandranKarthika

Petitioner(s)

Ravichandran

Adv. D. Mohan

Respondent(s)

Karthika

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

11-05-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case No. STC.1050/2024 - Summary This is a witness deposition record, not a final court order with a substantive judgment. The document records the cross-examination testimony of a prosecution witness (DW-1) named Karthika, dated 11.03.2026, before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sirkali. The witness testified regarding a loan dispute with the petitioner Ravichandran, contradicting several claims made against her—denying complete repayment of the loan and disputing various factual allegations. The deposition concludes with the cross-examination being completed and no further examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case No. STC.1050/2024 - Summary This is a witness deposition record, not a final court order with a substantive judgment. The document records the cross-examination testimony of a prosecution witness (DW-1) named Karthika, dated 11.03.2026, before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sirkali. The witness testified regarding a loan dispute with the petitioner Ravichandran, contradicting several claims made against her—denying complete repayment of the loan and disputing various factual allegations. The deposition concludes with the cross-examination being completed and no further examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case