State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, Sirkali Police Station vs Asaithambi Advocate - Thiru. R. KARTHIK RAJAN — 229/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY080019692021

Filing Number

1969/2021

Filing Date

17-May-2021

Registration No

229/2021

Registration Date

17-May-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Sirkali Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, Sirkali Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Asaithambi Advocate - Thiru. R. KARTHIK RAJAN

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Case No. CC.229/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali, the witness (Amudhimani, PW-5) testified on 23.09.2025 regarding a criminal matter. The witness stated having no knowledge of the case and denied signing any documents related to it, claiming the signature shown in court was not hers. Cross-examination of the witness was permitted and completed, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 22-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 23-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 15-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 02-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  52. 20-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 02-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 20-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 13-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  56. 05-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 29-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 23-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 12-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 04-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 20-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 13-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 05-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  64. 27-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 18-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  66. 16-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 27-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 20-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 16-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 06-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 25-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 11-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 25-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 03-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 27-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 20-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 10-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  78. 26-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 15-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  80. 06-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  81. 30-May-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  82. 26-May-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  83. 18-May-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  84. 08-May-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  85. 21-Apr-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  86. 11-Apr-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  87. 20-Mar-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  88. 09-Mar-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  89. 02-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  90. 10-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  91. 02-Feb-2023

    —View PDF

  92. 02-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  93. 09-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  94. 02-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  95. 11-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  96. 15-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  97. 07-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  98. 19-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  99. 11-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  100. 23-May-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  101. 25-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  102. 25-Mar-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  103. 17-Mar-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  104. 11-Feb-2022

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  105. 07-Jan-2022

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  106. 15-Dec-2021

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  107. 26-Nov-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  108. 01-Nov-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  109. 27-Sep-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  110. 23-Aug-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  111. 19-Aug-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  112. 17-Jun-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  113. 17-May-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 229/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Case No. CC.229/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali, the witness (Amudhimani, PW-5) testified on 23.09.2025 regarding a criminal matter. The witness stated having no knowledge of the case and denied signing any documents related to it, claiming the signature shown in court was not hers. Cross-examination of the witness was permitted and completed, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case