SI CHELLADURAI AKC PS vs SEKAR — 116/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY080019522025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
1945/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
116/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
325
Police Station
Annaikaranchathiram P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI CHELLADURAI AKC PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of police Anaikaranchatram
NAMASIVAYAM
Adv. Inspector of police Anaikaranchatram
Respondent(s)
SEKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 22-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.116/2025 This document records witness depositions in a criminal case before the Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali. On 6 October 2024, a violent altercation occurred in which respondent Sekar allegedly attacked the petitioners and witnesses with weapons (iron rod and sickle), causing injuries to their backs, waist, face and nose. The witnesses testified that after the assault, they filed a police complaint and received medical treatment. The defence did not conduct cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.116/2025 This document records witness depositions in a criminal case before the Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali. On 6 October 2024, a violent altercation occurred in which respondent Sekar allegedly attacked the petitioners and witnesses with weapons (iron rod and sickle), causing injuries to their backs, waist, face and nose. The witnesses testified that after the assault, they filed a police complaint and received medical treatment. The defence did not conduct cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts