Poongodi vs Kanunanithi — 13/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNMY080017872025

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2025

Filing Number

1784/2025

Filing Date

01-07-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

02-07-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

Poongodi

Respondent(s)

Kanunanithi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

22-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-11-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The petition for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found that the main application prima facie disclosed domestic violence and directed the husband to pay Rs. 7,000 per month in total (Rs. 2,000 for the wife and Rs. 5,000 for the minor daughter) as interim maintenance from November 1, 2025 until disposal of the main case, with the first installment due by December 19, 2025. The court rejected the wife's claim for Rs. 15,000 per month, citing her employment as a teacher and the absence of filed financial statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found that the main application prima facie disclosed domestic violence and directed the husband to pay Rs. 7,000 per month in total (Rs. 2,000 for the wife and Rs. 5,000 for the minor daughter) as interim maintenance from November 1, 2025 until disposal of the main case, with the first installment due by December 19, 2025. The court rejected the wife's claim for Rs. 15,000 per month, citing her employment as a teacher and the absence of filed financial statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case