The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudhupattinam Police Station vs Rajendran Advocate - Thiru S.KARTHIKEYAN (SIRKALI) — 217/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 506(i), 325. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY080013702020

Filing Number

1370/2020

Filing Date

16-Mar-2020

Registration No

217/2020

Registration Date

16-Mar-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

Pudupattinam Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 506(i), 325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudhupattinam Police Station

    Adv. A.P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajendran Advocate - Thiru S.KARTHIKEYAN (SIRKALI)

  2. 2.Kishokumar

    Adv. Thiru S.KARTHIKEYAN (SIRKALI)

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 11-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.217/2020 This witness deposition document records proceedings in Criminal Case No. CC.217/2020 before the Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali, involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 325, and 506(i) against defendants Rajendran and Kishokumar. The case arose from a June 17, 2019 incident where the complainant alleged assault. The court examined prosecution witness PW-7 and heard defense cross-examination arguments challenging the investigation's credibility, including inconsistencies between the original complaint and the 161 statement, lack of recovered weapons, and absence of medical evidence for head injuries. The defendants' counsel argued insufficient connection between the accused and the case. The document records witness examination and defense arguments but does not indicate a final judgment or bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  52. 30-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 27-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 17-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  56. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 25-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 19-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 11-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 02-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 22-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  64. 19-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 23-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  66. 21-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 13-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 01-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 20-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 09-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 06-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 26-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 18-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 09-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 22-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 11-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 23-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  78. 14-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 07-Aug-2023

    —View PDF

  80. 07-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  81. 25-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  82. 11-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  83. 26-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  84. 13-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  85. 01-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  86. 03-May-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  87. 21-Apr-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  88. 10-Apr-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  89. 23-Mar-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  90. 14-Mar-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  91. 27-Feb-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  92. 20-Feb-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  93. 30-Jan-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  94. 19-Jan-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  95. 13-Jan-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  96. 22-Dec-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  97. 28-Nov-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  98. 17-Nov-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  99. 10-Nov-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  100. 27-Oct-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  101. 15-Oct-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  102. 07-Oct-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  103. 23-Sep-2022

    —View PDF

  104. 23-Sep-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  105. 13-Sep-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  106. 26-Aug-2022

    —View PDF

  107. 26-Aug-2022

    —View PDF

  108. 26-Aug-2022

    —View PDF

  109. 26-Aug-2022

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  110. 15-Jun-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  111. 13-May-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  112. 11-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  113. 07-Mar-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  114. 07-Feb-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  115. 03-Jan-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  116. 22-Dec-2021

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  117. 18-Nov-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  118. 20-Oct-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  119. 14-Sep-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  120. 12-Jul-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  121. 20-May-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  122. 09-Mar-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  123. 29-Dec-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  124. 20-Oct-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  125. 04-Sep-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  126. 16-Jul-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  127. 02-Jun-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  128. 16-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  129. 16-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.217/2020 This witness deposition document records proceedings in Criminal Case No. CC.217/2020 before the Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali, involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 325, and 506(i) against defendants Rajendran and Kishokumar. The case arose from a June 17, 2019 incident where the complainant alleged assault. The court examined prosecution witness PW-7 and heard defense cross-examination arguments challenging the investigation's credibility, including inconsistencies between the original complaint and the 161 statement, lack of recovered weapons, and absence of medical evidence for head injuries. The defendants' counsel argued insufficient connection between the accused and the case. The document records witness examination and defense arguments but does not indicate a final judgment or bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case