Inspector of Police, Sirkali vs Jayaprakash S/o Shanmugaraj — 294/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY080009482026
Filing Number
945/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
294/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Sirkali Police Station
Year
2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Sirkali
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayaprakash S/o Shanmugaraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CRLMP 294/2026 The court granted bail to Jayaprakash (accused under Section 7(3) of the Lottery Act, Cr.No.96/2026) with conditions, considering that investigation was nearly complete, all witnesses were from police, and the accused's presence at home was necessary to escort his daughter to her 10th-grade board examination. The court imposed conditions including a ₹25,000 bail bond, daily reporting to police until 30.03.2026, regular court attendance, and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or destroying evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 294/2026
Case Summary: CRLMP 294/2026 The court granted bail to Jayaprakash (accused under Section 7(3) of the Lottery Act, Cr.No.96/2026) with conditions, considering that investigation was nearly complete, all witnesses were from police, and the accused's presence at home was necessary to escort his daughter to her 10th-grade board examination. The court imposed conditions including a ₹25,000 bail bond, daily reporting to police until 30.03.2026, regular court attendance, and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or destroying evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts