Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram vs Sudhagar S/o Srinivasan — 291/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY080009442026
Filing Number
941/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
291/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Annaikaranchathiram P.S.
Year
2026
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram
Respondent(s)
Sudhagar S/o Srinivasan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRLMP 291/2026 The court granted bail to Sudhagar, who was arrested on March 7, 2026, under BNS Sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) for an incident involving a two-wheeler dispute where he allegedly assaulted the complainant with words and a weapon along with three associates. The court found that the investigation had progressed substantially (statements recorded, medical reports obtained, complainant discharged from hospital), and bail conditions—including a bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting until April 1, 2026, and restrictions against witness intimidation—were sufficient to ensure the accused's presence and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRLMP 291/2026 The court granted bail to Sudhagar, who was arrested on March 7, 2026, under BNS Sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) for an incident involving a two-wheeler dispute where he allegedly assaulted the complainant with words and a weapon along with three associates. The court found that the investigation had progressed substantially (statements recorded, medical reports obtained, complainant discharged from hospital), and bail conditions—including a bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting until April 1, 2026, and restrictions against witness intimidation—were sufficient to ensure the accused's presence and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts