Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram vs Sudhagar S/o Srinivasan — 291/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY080009442026

Filing Number

941/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

291/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

Annaikaranchathiram P.S.

Year

2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudhagar S/o Srinivasan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLMP 291/2026 The court granted bail to Sudhagar, who was arrested on March 7, 2026, under BNS Sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) for an incident involving a two-wheeler dispute where he allegedly assaulted the complainant with words and a weapon along with three associates. The court found that the investigation had progressed substantially (statements recorded, medical reports obtained, complainant discharged from hospital), and bail conditions—including a bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting until April 1, 2026, and restrictions against witness intimidation—were sufficient to ensure the accused's presence and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 291/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLMP 291/2026 The court granted bail to Sudhagar, who was arrested on March 7, 2026, under BNS Sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) for an incident involving a two-wheeler dispute where he allegedly assaulted the complainant with words and a weapon along with three associates. The court found that the investigation had progressed substantially (statements recorded, medical reports obtained, complainant discharged from hospital), and bail conditions—including a bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting until April 1, 2026, and restrictions against witness intimidation—were sufficient to ensure the accused's presence and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case