Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu vs Stalin(468 crpc Petition) — 275/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY080009012026

Filing Number

899/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

615

Police Station

Thiruvenkadu Police Station

Year

2021

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Stalin(468 crpc Petition)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the accused Stalin's petition seeking FIR closure on grounds of expired limitation period under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghansham Soni v. State (2025 INSC 803), the court held that limitation is computed from the date of filing the complaint or institution of prosecution, not from when the magistrate takes cognizance. Finding the prosecution was instituted within the prescribed limitation period, the petition lacked merit and was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the accused Stalin's petition seeking FIR closure on grounds of expired limitation period under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghansham Soni v. State (2025 INSC 803), the court held that limitation is computed from the date of filing the complaint or institution of prosecution, not from when the magistrate takes cognizance. Finding the prosecution was instituted within the prescribed limitation period, the petition lacked merit and was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case