Sureshchand(STC 255/ vs Durairaj — 177/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY080007392026

Filing Number

739/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sureshchand(STC 255/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Durairaj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Durairaj's petition seeking permission to conduct his cheque dishonour case (₹50 lakh) through counsel while remaining in Dubai. The court found the accused's vakalatnama improperly executed and noted he had violated his earlier undertaking to appear, remaining absent for 10 months despite a non-bailable warrant. The court also observed the accused was paralyzing proceedings through similar frivolous petitions in another cheque case, rendering the vakalatnama invalid for all practical purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Durairaj's petition seeking permission to conduct his cheque dishonour case (₹50 lakh) through counsel while remaining in Dubai. The court found the accused's vakalatnama improperly executed and noted he had violated his earlier undertaking to appear, remaining absent for 10 months despite a non-bailable warrant. The court also observed the accused was paralyzing proceedings through similar frivolous petitions in another cheque case, rendering the vakalatnama invalid for all practical purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case