Ayyammal vs Dhachinamoorthy Advocate - Thiru B.RENGARAJU — 100400/2018

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O.7.R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY070005752018

Arguments

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100400/2018

Filing Date

11-12-2018

Registration No

100400/2018

Registration Date

11-12-2018

Court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O.7.R.1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25(d)27(c)
IA/2/2025 Classification : Reopen Petition Section AyyammalDhachinamoorthy
IA/3/2025 Classification : Recall Petition Section AyyammalDhachinamoorthy
IA/4/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section AyyammalDhachinamoorthy

Petitioner(s)

Ayyammal

Adv. Thiru.S.Swaminathan

Respondent(s)

Dhachinamoorthy Advocate - Thiru B.RENGARAJU

Kalavathy

Adv. Thiru B.RENGARAJU

Sub Registrar

Adv. Thiru S.ABDULLASHA - G.P - SIRKALI

District Collector

Adv. Thiru S.ABDULLASHA - G.P - SIRKALI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

17-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

26-03-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

09-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: In Original Case No. 400/2018 before the District Munsiff Court, Sirkazi, the cross-examination of witness PW-1 (Ayyammal, aged 83) was completed on 09.02.2026. The witness was examined regarding a land encroachment matter. The court concluded the cross-examination and noted there was no re-examination by the opposing party. The case record indicates the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Case No. 400/2018 before the District Munsiff Court, Sirkazi, the cross-examination of witness PW-1 (Ayyammal, aged 83) was completed on 09.02.2026. The witness was examined regarding a land encroachment matter. The court concluded the cross-examination and noted there was no re-examination by the opposing party. The case record indicates the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case