Anitha vs karunagaran Advocate - Thiru R.ADHMANATHAN — 232/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070004252020
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
459/2020
Filing Date
21-12-2020
Registration No
232/2020
Registration Date
23-12-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anitha
Adv. Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA
Magesh
Respondent(s)
karunagaran Advocate - Thiru R.ADHMANATHAN
Manogaran
Adv. Thiru.R.Adhmanathan
elangaovan
Adv. Thiru.R.Adhmanathan
Elavarasan
Adv. Thiru. R. Adhamanathan
Tamilarasi
Adv. Thiru.R.Adhmanathan
Kaliyarasi
Adv. Thiru.R.Adhmanathan
Sub Register
Adv. Thiru. S.Abdullasha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Additional Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
Amendment
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 07-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 03-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Commercial Court, Sirkali, allowed an interim application (IA 15/2025) in Original Suit 232/2020 dated March 18, 2026. The court granted permission to amend the pleading by correcting several factual discrepancies regarding property details, including correcting document numbers, dates, and land measurements in multiple paragraphs. The court rejected the defendants' objections and permitted the plaintiffs to proceed with the case after making the specified corrections to the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Commercial Court, Sirkali, allowed an interim application (IA 15/2025) in Original Suit 232/2020 dated March 18, 2026. The court granted permission to amend the pleading by correcting several factual discrepancies regarding property details, including correcting document numbers, dates, and land measurements in multiple paragraphs. The court rejected the defendants' objections and permitted the plaintiffs to proceed with the case after making the specified corrections to the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts