Sirkali Taluk Nanthiyanallur village Arulmigu Pasupathiswarar by its rep. R. Ashokan vs G.Amirthalingam Advocate - Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA — 121/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,Rule1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070002512020
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
218/2020
Filing Date
14-07-2020
Registration No
121/2020
Registration Date
05-08-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sirkali Taluk Nanthiyanallur village Arulmigu Pasupathiswarar by its rep. R. Ashokan
Adv. Thiru. E. SELVARAJ
Respondent(s)
G.Amirthalingam Advocate - Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 07-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 07-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 23-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Interim Application No. 06/2025 in Original Suit No. 121/2020, District Munsiff Court, Sirkali, dated 09.03.2026 Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that N. Pasupramanyan (second plaintiff/new party) be added as the second defendant/respondent in the original suit concerning a temple property dispute. The court rejected the defendant's objections and permitted the joinder under CPC Rule 10(2) and Section 151, as the second plaintiff is the original trustee's younger brother with legitimate interest in the temple trust matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Interim Application No. 06/2025 in Original Suit No. 121/2020, District Munsiff Court, Sirkali, dated 09.03.2026 Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that N. Pasupramanyan (second plaintiff/new party) be added as the second defendant/respondent in the original suit concerning a temple property dispute. The court rejected the defendant's objections and permitted the joinder under CPC Rule 10(2) and Section 151, as the second plaintiff is the original trustee's younger brother with legitimate interest in the temple trust matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts