Roslin sagayameri vs Health inspector Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR — 184/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7Ru1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY070002392025

Arguments

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

288/2025

Filing Date

03-11-2025

Registration No

184/2025

Registration Date

04-11-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7Ru1

Petitioner(s)

Roslin sagayameri

Adv. KARTHIKRAJAN

Respondent(s)

Health inspector Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR

The District Collector

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

17-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Part Heard

01-04-2026

Part Heard

16-03-2026

Trial

09-03-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

17-04-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: In Original Case No. 184/2025 before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Chief) Muthaiyan on April 17, 2026. The witness testified in support of the plaintiff's case, affirming that his sworn statement was true and accurate. During cross-examination by the defendant's counsel, the witness denied being related to the plaintiff and clarified that his testimony was not biased despite being from the same village. The cross-examination was concluded with no re-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Case No. 184/2025 before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Chief) Muthaiyan on April 17, 2026. The witness testified in support of the plaintiff's case, affirming that his sworn statement was true and accurate. During cross-examination by the defendant's counsel, the witness denied being related to the plaintiff and clarified that his testimony was not biased despite being from the same village. The cross-examination was concluded with no re-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case