Roslin sagayameri vs Health inspector Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR — 184/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7Ru1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070002392025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
288/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
184/2025
Registration Date
04-11-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Roslin sagayameri
Adv. KARTHIKRAJAN
Respondent(s)
Health inspector Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR
The District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
Trial
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 184/2025 before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Chief) Muthaiyan on April 17, 2026. The witness testified in support of the plaintiff's case, affirming that his sworn statement was true and accurate. During cross-examination by the defendant's counsel, the witness denied being related to the plaintiff and clarified that his testimony was not biased despite being from the same village. The cross-examination was concluded with no re-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 184/2025 before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Chief) Muthaiyan on April 17, 2026. The witness testified in support of the plaintiff's case, affirming that his sworn statement was true and accurate. During cross-examination by the defendant's counsel, the witness denied being related to the plaintiff and clarified that his testimony was not biased despite being from the same village. The cross-examination was concluded with no re-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts