Kalavathi and 4 others vs Manimaran and 3 others Advocate - Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA — 100195/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070002202015
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
09-09-2015
Registration No
100195/2015
Registration Date
09-09-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalavathi and 4 others
Adv. Thiru A.Ramkumar
Karkuzhali
Adv. Thiru A.Ramkumar
Kamali
Adv. Thiru A.Ramkumar
Nivetha
Adv. Thiru A.Ramkumar
Akkish
Adv. Thiru A.Ramkumar
Respondent(s)
Manimaran and 3 others Advocate - Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA
Manimozhi
Adv. Thiru. R. VENUGOPALAN
Mahesh
Maheshwari
Adv. Thiru S.SUNDRAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 17-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 02-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 24-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Case No. 195/2015 before the District Civil Court in Sirkali, the court recorded the testimony of witness DW-1 (Manimaaran) on August 19, 2025, regarding a dispute involving sugarcane registration and transactions with Talaignayiru Cooperative Sugar Factory. The court admitted 22 documentary exhibits including deed copies, FIR copies, sugarcane purchase records, and previous judgment copies. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the witness at the request of the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Case No. 195/2015 before the District Civil Court in Sirkali, the court recorded the testimony of witness DW-1 (Manimaaran) on August 19, 2025, regarding a dispute involving sugarcane registration and transactions with Talaignayiru Cooperative Sugar Factory. The court admitted 22 documentary exhibits including deed copies, FIR copies, sugarcane purchase records, and previous judgment copies. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the witness at the request of the plaintiff's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts