Vimala vs Dhachinamoorthy Advocate - Thiru. A. RAMKUMAR — 131/2019

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O.7R.1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY070002172019

Amendment

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

217/2019

Filing Date

10-07-2019

Registration No

131/2019

Registration Date

10-07-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O.7R.1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27(c)
IA/4/2025 Classification : LR Petition Section VimalaDhachinamoorthy

Petitioner(s)

Vimala

Adv. Thiru.B. RENGARAJU

Balakrishnan

Adv. Thiru B.RENGARAJU

Respondent(s)

Dhachinamoorthy Advocate - Thiru. A. RAMKUMAR

Vinoth @ Ramanathan

Adv. Thiru. A. RAMKUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

24-04-2026

Amendment

09-04-2026

Amendment

25-03-2026

Amendment

10-03-2026

Amendment

27-02-2026

Amendment

Interim Orders

10-09-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a civil property case from the District Munsif Court, Sirkali (Original Case No. 131/2019) dated 10.09.2025. The court recorded cross-examination of a defense witness (DW-1) regarding property disputes involving three schedules (A, B, and C) of properties in Tiruvenkaadu. The cross-examination covered details about property boundaries, survey numbers, measurements, and ownership documents. The court adjourned the case to allow continuation of cross-examination at the plaintiff's counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil property case from the District Munsif Court, Sirkali (Original Case No. 131/2019) dated 10.09.2025. The court recorded cross-examination of a defense witness (DW-1) regarding property disputes involving three schedules (A, B, and C) of properties in Tiruvenkaadu. The cross-examination covered details about property boundaries, survey numbers, measurements, and ownership documents. The court adjourned the case to allow continuation of cross-examination at the plaintiff's counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case