Vahidha Banu vs Mohamed Imran — 192/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section or7r1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY070001952025

Filing Number

227/2025

Filing Date

01-Sep-2025

Registration No

192/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section or7r1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vahidha Banu

    Adv. Thiru V.KUMARESAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohamed Imran

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary In this civil case (O.A. No. 192/2025) before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the plaintiff (PW1) testified on April 18, 2026, regarding a matrimonial matter. The plaintiff presented documentary evidence including marriage invitation, marriage certificate, birth certificate of a child, and other supporting documents, and requested judgment in their favor. The defendant did not appear and was proceeded against ex-parte, resulting in no cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 192/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this civil case (O.A. No. 192/2025) before the District Civil Court, Sirkali, the plaintiff (PW1) testified on April 18, 2026, regarding a matrimonial matter. The plaintiff presented documentary evidence including marriage invitation, marriage certificate, birth certificate of a child, and other supporting documents, and requested judgment in their favor. The defendant did not appear and was proceeded against ex-parte, resulting in no cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case