Ramalingam vs Kaliyaperumal and another Advocate - Thiru. S. SWAMINATHAN — 100132/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c)and30. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070001512015
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
17-06-2015
Registration No
100132/2015
Registration Date
17-06-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramalingam
Adv. Thiru. A.Ramkumar
Respondent(s)
Kaliyaperumal and another Advocate - Thiru. S. SWAMINATHAN
Raja
Adv. Thiru. S. SWAMINATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a property dispute case from the District Court of Sirkali (Case No. 132/2015 C/W OS.169/2019) heard on April 8, 2026. The cross-examination of Defense Witness 1 (Raja) was recorded, with testimony regarding boundary descriptions, property boundaries, and competing claims over 1.5 acres of land (Schedule B property) between the plaintiff Ramalinga and defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony confirming various boundary details and the plaintiff's permission to occupy the property, and concluded the cross-examination without further re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a property dispute case from the District Court of Sirkali (Case No. 132/2015 C/W OS.169/2019) heard on April 8, 2026. The cross-examination of Defense Witness 1 (Raja) was recorded, with testimony regarding boundary descriptions, property boundaries, and competing claims over 1.5 acres of land (Schedule B property) between the plaintiff Ramalinga and defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony confirming various boundary details and the plaintiff's permission to occupy the property, and concluded the cross-examination without further re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts