Christopher Ponnan vs Holy Redeemer Finance Corporation rep. by its Iruthaiyaraj — 86/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7r.1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070001402022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
176/2022
Filing Date
05-04-2022
Registration No
86/2022
Registration Date
06-04-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Christopher Ponnan
Adv. M.Sudha
Respondent(s)
Holy Redeemer Finance Corporation rep. by its Iruthaiyaraj
Sub Registar
Adv. Thiru S.Muthukumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court, Sirkali allowed the plaintiff's suit and declared that a mortgage loan of ₹10,000 taken on 23.11.1990 against a mortgaged property has been fully repaid by the plaintiff with no outstanding balance. The court ordered the first defendant (lender) and second defendant (registration office) to issue a discharge receipt confirming the loan's closure, rejecting the defendants' arguments that procedural requirements prevented releasing the discharge document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court, Sirkali allowed the plaintiff's suit and declared that a mortgage loan of ₹10,000 taken on 23.11.1990 against a mortgaged property has been fully repaid by the plaintiff with no outstanding balance. The court ordered the first defendant (lender) and second defendant (registration office) to issue a discharge receipt confirming the loan's closure, rejecting the defendants' arguments that procedural requirements prevented releasing the discharge document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts