Manonmani vs Krishnamoorthy Advocate - Thiru. S. Karthikeyan — 67/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or7R.1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY070000912021

Amendment

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

119/2021

Filing Date

29-04-2021

Registration No

67/2021

Registration Date

29-04-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or7R.1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27(c)
IA/4/2026 Classification : Petition to Accept Power of Attorney Section ManonmaniKrishnamoorthy

Petitioner(s)

Manonmani

Adv. Thiru, G.Saravanan

Respondent(s)

Krishnamoorthy Advocate - Thiru. S. Karthikeyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

16-04-2026

Amendment

06-04-2026

IA Pending

26-03-2026

IA Pending

10-03-2026

IA Pending

23-02-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

11-01-2022
Copy of Judgment/Order

SUMMARY: The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner without granting the sought-after interim injunction. The court found that since the main case (Civil Case No. 67/2021) involving a dispute over property ownership is still pending and requires examination of evidence from both parties, it was premature to grant interim relief without hearing substantive arguments. The court closed the interim petition while noting that a previous interim order dated 29.04.2021 was cancelled, and directed that the property in question remain undisturbed pending final resolution of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner without granting the sought-after interim injunction. The court found that since the main case (Civil Case No. 67/2021) involving a dispute over property ownership is still pending and requires examination of evidence from both parties, it was premature to grant interim relief without hearing substantive arguments. The court closed the interim petition while noting that a previous interim order dated 29.04.2021 was cancelled, and directed that the property in question remain undisturbed pending final resolution of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case