EQUITAS BANK vs SUJITHA Advocate - N.Nagarajan — 40/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or37R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY070000462025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
03-03-2025
Registration No
40/2025
Registration Date
05-03-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EQUITAS BANK
Adv. Tmt. M. SUTHA
Respondent(s)
SUJITHA Advocate - N.Nagarajan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment/Order
The District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission in Sirkazhi ruled in favor of Equitas Bank against respondent Sujitha, ordering the defendant to repay ₹54,978 with interest at 12% per annum from the filing date until judgment, and 6% post-judgment interest until full repayment. The case was disposed with a settlement order after the defendant failed to appear despite notice, resulting in an ex-parte judgment in favor of the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission in Sirkazhi ruled in favor of Equitas Bank against respondent Sujitha, ordering the defendant to repay ₹54,978 with interest at 12% per annum from the filing date until judgment, and 6% post-judgment interest until full repayment. The case was disposed with a settlement order after the defendant failed to appear despite notice, resulting in an ex-parte judgment in favor of the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts